Can the actions of an outlaw be justified if he/she has good intentions?
One of the most well known examples to consider is Robin Hood, who stole from the rich to give to the poor. Stealing is obviously morally wrong (not to mention illegal!), so why is he considered such a hero? Or does the morality of giving money to the poor disappear because it was gained illegally?
Vigilantes are often taking the law into their own hands to being about 'justice'. But who are they to decide what should be done about the real outlaws? Or should they be applauded for doing something the government is too afraid to do themselves?
One of the most well known examples to consider is Robin Hood, who stole from the rich to give to the poor. Stealing is obviously morally wrong (not to mention illegal!), so why is he considered such a hero? Or does the morality of giving money to the poor disappear because it was gained illegally?
Vigilantes are often taking the law into their own hands to being about 'justice'. But who are they to decide what should be done about the real outlaws? Or should they be applauded for doing something the government is too afraid to do themselves?
No comments:
Post a Comment